3.3 The fundamental theorem of Galois theory
Let be an extension of . A subextension of is an extension with , i.e., a field with . When is Galois over , the subextensions of are in one-to-one correspondence with the subgroups of . More precisely, there is the following statement.
Let be a Galois extension of with Galois group . The map is a bijection from the set of subgroups of to the set of subextensions of ,
with inverse . Moreover,
-
(a)
the correspondence is inclusion-reversing:
-
(b)
indexes equal degrees: ;
-
(c)
, i.e., ;
-
(d)
is normal in is normal (hence Galois) over , in which case
For the first statement, we have to show that and are inverse maps. Let be a subgroup of . Then, Corollary 3.5 shows that . Let be a subextension. Then is Galois over by (3.13), which means that .
(a) We have the obvious implications,
As , this proves (a).
(b) Let be a subgroup of . According to 3.11b,
This proves (b) in the case , and the general case follows, using that
(c) For and ,
Therefore, fixes if and only if fixes , and so . This shows that corresponds to
(d) Let be a normal subgroup of . Because for all , we must have for all , i.e., the action of on stabilizes . We therefore have a homomorphism
whose kernel is . As , we see that is Galois over (by Theorem 3.9) and that (by 3.11b).
Conversely, suppose that is normal over , and let generate over . For , is a root of the minimal polynomial of over , and so lies in . Hence , and this implies that (by (c)). □
Let be a Galois extension, so that there is an order reversing bijection between the subextensions of and the subgroups of . From this, we can read off the following results.
(a) Let be subextensions of , and let be the subgroup corresponding to (i.e., ). Then (by definition) is the smallest field containing all ; hence it must correspond to the largest subgroup contained in all , which is . Therefore
(b) Let be a subgroup of and let . The largest normal subgroup contained in is (see GT, 4.1), and so is the smallest normal extension of containing . Note that, by (a), is the composite of the fields . It is called the normal, or Galois, closure of in .
Let and be extensions of contained in some common field. If is Galois, then and are Galois, and the map
is an isomorphism.
Because is Galois over , it is the splitting field of a separable polynomial
. Then is the splitting field of over , and is the splitting field of over . Hence and are Galois. Every automorphism of fixing the elements of maps roots of to roots of , and so . There is therefore a homomorphism
If fixes the elements of , then it fixes the elements of , and hence is the identity map. Thus, is injective. If is fixed by all , then . By Corollary 3.5,
this implies that the image of is . □
Suppose, in the proposition, that is finite over . Then
Let and be extensions of contained in some common field. If and are Galois over , then and are Galois over , and the map
is an isomorphism of onto the subgroup
of .
Proof: Let , and let be its minimal polynomial over . Then has
distinct roots in and distinct roots in . Since can have at most roots in , it follows that it has distinct roots in . This shows that is normal and separable over , and hence Galois (3.9). As and are Galois over , they are splitting fields for separable polynomials . Now is a splitting field for , and hence it also is Galois over . The map is clearly an injective homomorphism, and its image is contained in . We’ll prove that the image is the whole of by counting.
From the fundamental theorem,
and so, for each , has exactly extensions to an element of . Therefore,
which equals by (3.19)