3.1 Groups of automorphisms of fields

Consider fields EFE\supset F. An FF-isomorphism EEE\rightarrow E is called an FF-automorphism of EE. The FF-automorphisms of EE form a group, which we denote Aut(E/F)\operatorname{Aut}(E/F).

Example 3.1

(a) There are two obvious automorphisms of \mathbb{C}, namely, the identity map and complex conjugation. We’ll see later (LABEL:te16) that by using the Axiom of Choice we can construct uncountably many more.

(b) Let E=(X)E=\mathbb{C}(X). A \mathbb{C}{}-automorphism of EE{} sends XX to another generator of EE over \mathbb{C}{}. It follows from (LABEL:te17a) below that these are exactly the elements aX+bcX+d\frac{aX+b}{cX+d}, adbc0ad-bc\neq 0. Therefore Aut(E/)\operatorname{Aut}(E/\mathbb{C}) consists of the maps f(X)f(aX+bcX+d)f(X)\mapsto f\left(\frac{aX+b}{cX+d}\right), adbc0ad-bc\neq 0, and so

Aut(E/)PGL2(),\operatorname{Aut}(E/\mathbb{C})\simeq\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(\mathbb{C}),

the group of invertible 2×22\times 2 matrices with complex coefficients modulo its centre. Analysts will note that this is the same as the automorphism group of the Riemann sphere. Here is the explanation. The field EE of meromorphic functions on the Riemann sphere 1\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{C}}^{1} consists of the rational functions in zz, i.e., E=(z)(X)E=\mathbb{C}(z)\simeq\mathbb{C}(X), and the natural map Aut(1)Aut(E/)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{C}}^{1})\rightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(E% /\mathbb{C}) is an isomorphism.

(c) The group Aut((X1,X2)/)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{C}(X_{1},X_{2})/\mathbb{C}) is quite complicated — there is a map

PGL3()=Aut(2)Aut((X1,X2)/),\operatorname{PGL}_{3}(\mathbb{C})=\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{C}}^% {2})\hookrightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{C}(X_{1},X_{2})/\mathbb{C}),

but this is very far from being surjective. When there are even more variables XX, the group is not known. The group Aut((X1,,Xn)/)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{C}(X_{1},\ldots,X_{n})/\mathbb{C}) is the group of birational automorphisms of projective nn-space n\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{C}}^{n}, and is called the Cremona group. Its study is part of algebraic geometry (Wikipedia: Cremona group).

In this section, we’ll be concerned with the groups Aut(E/F)\operatorname{Aut}(E/F) when EE is a finite extension of FF.

Proposition 3.2

Let EE be a splitting field of a separable polynomial ff in F[X]F[X]; then Aut(E/F)\operatorname{Aut}(E/F) has order [E:F].[E\colon F].

Proof.

As ff is separable, it has degf\deg f distinct roots in EE. Therefore Proposition 2.7 shows that the number of FF-homomorphisms EEE\rightarrow E is [E:F][E\colon F]. Because EE is finite over FF, all such homomorphisms are isomorphisms.

Example 3.3

Consider a simple extension E=F[α]E=F[\alpha], and let ff be a polynomial in F[X]F[X] having α\alpha as a root. If α\alpha is the only root of ff in EE, then Aut(E/F)=1\operatorname{Aut}(E/F)=1 by (2.1b). For example, if 23\sqrt[3]{2} is the real cube root of 22, then Aut([23]/)=1\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt[3]{2}]/\mathbb{Q})=1. As another example, let FF be a field of characteristic p0p\neq 0, and let aa be an element of FF that is not a ppth power. Let EE be a splitting field of f=Xpa.f=X^{p}-a. Then ff has only one root in EE (see 2.11), and so Aut(E/F)=1\operatorname{Aut}(E/F)=1.

These examples show that, in the statement of the proposition, is necessary that EE be a splitting field of a separable polynomial.

When GG is a group of automorphisms of a field EE, we set

EG=Inv(G)={αEσα=α, all σG}.E^{G}=\operatorname{Inv}(G)=\{\alpha\in E\mid\sigma\alpha=\alpha\text{, all }% \sigma\in G\}.

It is a subfield of EE, called the subfield of GG-invariants of EE or the fixed field of GG.

In this section, we’ll show that, when EE is the splitting field of a separable polynomial in F[X]F[X] and G=Aut(E/F)G=\operatorname{Aut}(E/F), then the maps

MAut(E/M),HInv(H)M\mapsto\operatorname{Aut}(E/M),\quad H\mapsto\operatorname{Inv}(H)

give a one-to-one correspondence between the set of intermediate fields MM, FMEF\subset M\subset E, and the set of subgroups HH of GG.

Theorem 3.4 (E. Artin)

Let GG be a finite group of automorphisms of a field EE, then

[E:EG](G:1).[E\colon E^{G}]\leq(G\colon 1).

Proof.

Let F=EGF=E^{G}, and let G={σ1,,σm}G=\{\sigma_{1},\ldots,\sigma_{m}\} with σ1\sigma_{1} the identity map. It suffices to show that every set {α1,,αn}\{\alpha_{1},\ldots,\alpha_{n}\} of elements of EE with n>mn>m is linearly dependent over FF. For such a set, consider the system of linear equations

σ1(α1)X1++σ1(αn)Xn\displaystyle\sigma_{1}(\alpha_{1})X_{1}+\cdots+\sigma_{1}(\alpha_{n})X_{n}
=0\displaystyle=0
equation (6) (6)
\displaystyle\vdots\qquad\qquad
σm(α1)X1++σm(αn)Xn\displaystyle\sigma_{m}(\alpha_{1})X_{1}+\cdots+\sigma_{m}(\alpha_{n})X_{n}
=0\displaystyle=0

with coefficients in EE. There are mm equations and n>mn>m unknowns, and hence there are nontrivial solutions in EE. We choose one (c1,,cn)(c_{1},\ldots,c_{n}) having the fewest possible nonzero elements. After renumbering the αi\alpha_{i}, we may suppose that c10c_{1}\neq 0, and then, after multiplying by a scalar, that c1Fc_{1}\in F. With these normalizations, we’ll show that all ciFc_{i}\in F, and so the first equation

α1c1++αncn=0\alpha_{1}c_{1}+\cdots+\alpha_{n}c_{n}=0

(recall that σ1\sigma_{1} is the identity map) is a linear relation on the αi\alpha_{i}.

If not all cic_{i} are in FF, then σk(ci)ci\sigma_{k}(c_{i})\neq c_{i} for some k1k\neq 1 and i1i\neq 1. On applying σk\sigma_{k} to the system of linear equations

σ1(α1)c1++σ1(αn)cn\displaystyle\sigma_{1}(\alpha_{1})c_{1}+\cdots+\sigma_{1}(\alpha_{n})c_{n}
=0\displaystyle=0
\displaystyle\vdots\qquad\qquad
σm(α1)c1++σm(αn)cn\displaystyle\sigma_{m}(\alpha_{1})c_{1}+\cdots+\sigma_{m}(\alpha_{n})c_{n}
=0\displaystyle=0

and using that {σkσ1,,σkσm}={σ1,,σm}\{\sigma_{k}\sigma_{1},\ldots,\sigma_{k}\sigma_{m}\}=\{\sigma_{1},\ldots,% \sigma_{m}\} (σk\sigma_{k} merely permutes the σi\sigma_{i}), we find that

(c1,σk(c2),,σk(ci),)(c_{1},\sigma_{k}(c_{2}),\ldots,\sigma_{k}(c_{i}),\ldots)

is also a solution to the system of equations (6). On subtracting it from the first solution, we obtain a solution (0,,ciσk(ci),)(0,\ldots,c_{i}-\sigma_{k}(c_{i}),\ldots), which is nonzero (look at the iith entry), but has more zeros than the first solution (look at the first entry) — contradiction.

Corollary 3.5

Let GG be a finite group of automorphisms of a field EE; then

G=Aut(E/EG).G=\operatorname{Aut}(E/E^{G}).

Proof.

As GAut(E/EG)G\subset\operatorname{Aut}(E/E^{G}), we have inequalities

[E:EG]3.4(G:1)(Aut(E/EG):1)2.8a[E:EG].[E\colon E^{G}]\overset{\text{\ref{ft10}}}{\leq}(G\colon 1)\leq(\operatorname{% Aut}(E/E^{G})\colon 1)\overset{\text{\ref{sf8}a}}{\leq}[E\colon E^{G}].

All the inequalities must be equalities, and so G=Aut(E/EG).G=\operatorname{Aut}(E/E^{G}).