3.1 Groups of automorphisms of fields
Consider fields . An -isomorphism is called an -automorphism of . The -automorphisms of form a group, which we denote .
(a) There are two obvious automorphisms of , namely, the identity map and complex conjugation. We’ll see later (LABEL:te16) that by using the Axiom of Choice we can construct uncountably many more.
(b) Let . A -automorphism of sends to another generator of over . It follows from (LABEL:te17a) below that these are exactly the elements , . Therefore consists of the maps , , and so
the group of invertible matrices with complex coefficients modulo its centre. Analysts will note that this is the same as the automorphism group of the Riemann sphere. Here is the explanation. The field of meromorphic functions on the Riemann sphere consists of the rational functions in , i.e., , and the natural map is an isomorphism.
(c) The group is quite complicated — there is a map
but this is very far from being surjective. When there are even more variables , the group is not known. The group is the group of birational automorphisms of projective -space , and is called the Cremona group. Its study is part of algebraic geometry (Wikipedia: Cremona group).
In this section, we’ll be concerned with the groups when is a finite extension of .
Let be a splitting field of a separable polynomial in ; then has order
As is separable, it has distinct roots in . Therefore Proposition 2.7 shows that the number of -homomorphisms is . Because is finite over , all such homomorphisms are isomorphisms. □
Consider a simple extension , and let be a polynomial in having as a root. If is the only root of in , then by (2.1b). For example, if is the real cube root of , then . As another example, let be a field of characteristic , and let be an element of that is not a th power. Let be a splitting field of Then has only one root in (see 2.11), and so .
These examples show that, in the statement of the proposition, is necessary that be a splitting field of a separable polynomial.
When is a group of automorphisms of a field , we set
It is a subfield of , called the subfield of -invariants of or the fixed field of .
In this section, we’ll show that, when is the splitting field of a separable polynomial in and , then the maps
give a one-to-one correspondence between the set of intermediate fields , , and the set of subgroups of .
Let be a finite group of automorphisms of a field , then
Let , and let with the identity map. It suffices to show that every set of elements of with is linearly dependent over . For such a set, consider the system of linear equations
with coefficients in . There are equations and unknowns, and hence there are nontrivial solutions in . We choose one having the fewest possible nonzero elements. After renumbering the , we may suppose that , and then, after multiplying by a scalar, that . With these normalizations, we’ll show that all , and so the first equation
(recall that is the identity map) is a linear relation on the .
If not all are in , then for some and . On applying to the system of linear equations
and using that ( merely permutes the ), we find that
is also a solution to the system of equations (6). On subtracting it from the first solution, we obtain a solution , which is nonzero (look at the th entry), but has more zeros than the first solution (look at the first entry) — contradiction. □
Let be a finite group of automorphisms of a field ; then
As , we have inequalities
All the inequalities must be equalities, and so □