1.7 The subring generated by a subset
An intersection of subrings of a ring is again a ring (this is easy to prove). Let be a subfield of a field , and let be a subset of . The intersection of all the subrings of containing and is obviously the smallest subring of containing both and . We call it the subring of generated by and (or generated over by ), and we denote it by . When , we write for . For example, .
The ring consists of the elements of that can be expressed as finite sums of the form
Let be the set of all such elements. Obviously, is a subring of containing and and contained in every other such subring. Therefore it equals . □
The ring , , consists of the real numbers that can be expressed as a finite sum
The ring consists of the complex numbers of the form , .
Note that the expression of an element in the form (1) will not be unique in general. This is so already in .
Let be an integral domain containing a subfield (as a subring). If is finite-dimensional when regarded as an -vector space, then it is a field.
Let be a nonzero element of — we have to show that has an inverse in . The map is an injective linear map of finite-dimensional -vector spaces, and is therefore surjective. In particular, there is an element such that . □
Note that the lemma applies to every subring containing of a finite extension of .